Our research method and evidence score

Where the entries came from

On 25 October 2026, we captured the organic results for the English query “escort <place>” with the search country and location set to each market. The capture covered 645 selected cities and destinations. We chose 600 for this edition; some searches returned fewer than ten results. The place list reflects an editorial focus on larger and premium markets, not measured search demand or exhaustive worldwide coverage.

We then checked result pages and sampled websites on 25–26 October, recording what could be opened, what each page said and how specifically it referred to the place. A result that appeared in search but could not be read remains an uncertain lead. A sampled homepage or country page is not evidence that every city page on the same host works.

What counts as a local result

We distinguish agencies, classified directories, independent profiles, venues, guides and communities. An operator type is our reading of the available page, not a verification of company identity. A place name in a title or category can be useful for navigation, but it does not establish an active local roster or a business physically based there.

City pages separate stronger local evidence from other relevant results and explain uncertain geography where we found it. Results removed as unrelated or from the wrong place stay in the dated research ledger; they are not turned into public recommendations.

What the number means

The figure out of 100 combines public evidence of a site’s local relevance with checkable website signals. It is not a customer rating, safety certificate or verdict on the quality of a service. Search position does not contribute to it.

City-page fit: 20/100
Geographic footprint: 15/100
Clear operator type: 10/100
Useful page content: 10/100
Checkable safeguards: 15/100
Independent feedback tied to the city: 30/100

Where a website could be assessed, a separate /20 figure considers usability and local depth. It measures the site, not an encounter. An inaccessible page is left unassessed rather than awarded a website-quality score.

Editorial reviews and outside feedback

Each site note is an editorial reading of the saved result, accessible pages and available outside sources. It describes the platform’s format and claims, then states what remained unseen. It is not a first-person account of using an escort service.

Automated drafts helped organize the saved research records. Every published English and Russian site review was then checked and edited individually against those records. That source review does not turn the text into first-hand customer evidence.

Independent feedback only supports a city-specific finding when its scope actually matches that city. A rating of an entire platform is not a local customer review; a directory mention is not a completed-service account. Our search for independent reviews is unfinished for some cities. “No verified finding” means no qualifying evidence in this pass, not proof that reviews do not exist. The current static public edition does not accept or publish visitor submissions.

Freshness, images and corrections

This is a dated snapshot, not live inventory. Listings, prices, ownership, availability and policies may have changed after the checks. We do not verify advertiser identities or present a website’s claims about screening and safety as established facts. Site logos and icons help identify a result; they do not prove ownership or quality.

The static edition has no public correction form or contact channel yet. Until one is available, the dates and source limits on each page should be read literally. A new check may change a site’s classification, city placement or evidence score.

Languages in this edition

The editorial site reviews were written in English and translated into Russian. The French interface currently shows the English original of each site review with a language notice. We do not present that English text as a French translation.